To solve this problem, we need to rearrange the array such that the signs of the numbers alternate—starting with a positive number, followed by a negative, and so on. The aim is to do this efficiently without using extra space.
We handle this using an index-based placement strategy. We imagine two roles: one index (say posIndex
) is in charge of placing positives at even indices (0, 2, 4...), and another index (say negIndex
) is for placing negatives at odd indices (1, 3, 5...).
As we go through the array, we check if the current element is at the wrong place based on its sign. If it is, we place it in the correct index (posIndex
or negIndex
) and increment that index by 2. This ensures alternate placement of positives and negatives.
Handling Different Cases
- Normal case: When the number of positives and negatives is roughly equal, this alternating pattern works perfectly, and we end up with a well-balanced array.
- Unequal count: If one type (say, positives) is more than the other, then the extra values will be left over at the end. That’s okay and acceptable by the problem definition.
- All positive or all negative: If there’s no opposite sign to alternate with, we simply return the array as-is. Nothing can be rearranged here.
- Empty array: The result is also an empty array since there's nothing to rearrange.
- Single element: Whether it’s positive or negative, it should be returned untouched because there's no second number to alternate with.
This approach is optimal as it rearranges the array in a single traversal and uses only constant extra space (O(1)).
Also, note that the relative order of the numbers does not matter. So swapping values to place them correctly is allowed and helps us achieve this in-place.