The key idea to solve this problem lies in the structure of a Binary Search Tree (BST). In a BST, if we perform an in-order traversal (i.e., visit left subtree → root → right subtree), we get the elements in ascending sorted order.
Let’s break down the problem based on various scenarios:
1. Normal Case:
If the BST has enough nodes (at least k
nodes), we can simply perform an in-order traversal and keep track of how many nodes we’ve seen. When we visit the kth
node in this order, that’s our answer. For example, if we need the 3rd smallest element in a tree with values [2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8], we count as we visit nodes and return the 3rd one: 4
.
2. Left-Skewed Tree:
In this case, the smallest values are deeper in the left. Traversing left first guarantees that we visit smaller nodes early. If the tree is just a descending chain, the smallest elements are at the bottom. The logic remains the same — an in-order traversal still works.
3. Right-Skewed Tree:
Similar to the left-skewed case, but here the smallest elements are at the top. Traversal still yields sorted order, so counting until the kth
value is still valid.
4. Edge Case – Empty Tree:
If the tree is empty, it has no nodes. Any value of k
is invalid here because there’s nothing to choose. We should handle this case gracefully by returning None
or raising an exception.
5. k Larger Than Node Count:
This is typically ruled out by problem constraints (i.e., assume 1 ≤ k ≤ N
), but in practical implementations, it’s still important to check this scenario to avoid index errors or incorrect results.
In summary, the in-order traversal approach is effective and intuitive because it leverages the natural sorted ordering of BSTs. The only tricky parts involve handling invalid input, such as empty trees or out-of-bound values for k
.