Solution Explanation
Case 1: The Tree is Empty
An empty tree (i.e., the root node is null
) is considered a valid Binary Search Tree by definition. Since there are no nodes, the BST property is trivially satisfied.
Answer: true
Case 2: The Tree is a Valid BST
If the tree follows all the rules of a BST—where for each node, all values in the left subtree are strictly less than the node, and all values in the right subtree are strictly greater—it qualifies as a valid BST.
This condition must hold not just at the root, but throughout the tree. For example, in the tree:
2
/ \
1 3
Both children follow the rules with respect to the root 2
, and since they don’t have further children, the validation ends successfully.
Answer: true
Case 3: The Tree Violates BST Rules
A tree may appear locally valid but fail to follow BST rules deeper down the subtree. For instance:
5
/ \
1 4
/ \
3 6
Here, the node 3
is in the right subtree of 5
but is less than 5
. This violates the BST property that all right children (and their descendants) must be greater than the root.
Answer: false
Case 4: Subtle Violations from Deep Nodes
Sometimes violations are not obvious at the first level. Consider this tree:
10
/ \
5 15
/ \
6 20
At first glance, all immediate children seem valid. However, node 6
is in the right subtree of 10
but is less than 10
, which breaks the BST rule.
Such errors can only be detected by checking the value of each node against a range defined by its ancestors—not just its immediate parent.
Answer: false
Case 5: Perfectly Valid and Balanced BST
In a complete BST like this:
8
/ \
4 12
/ \ / \
2 6 10 14
Each node correctly places its children to the left (smaller) and right (greater), and this is true recursively throughout the tree. It passes all BST checks.
Answer: true